Crossroads, Detours and Dead Ends

Crossroads, detours and dead ends organise different accounts of a journey. A crossroads presents possible directions; a detour changes the route; a dead end stops a particular route from continuing. In figurative language, these arrangements can describe decisions, interrupted plans and limits to progress.

This page develops the subject of Paths and Trails through comparisons of choice, access and destination. The invented examples below are reading aids, not fixed interpretations of personal imagery.

A choice of directions, a route around an obstacle and the termination of a route are distinct arrangements. Original diagram, CC0.

Three different arrangements

Cambridge records crossroads for a road intersection and for an important, uncertain stage in a process. A choice can be important without the alternatives being equally attractive, equally accessible or fully known.

Oxford defines a detour as a longer route taken to avoid a difficulty or to visit somewhere. It also records the North American use for a route replacing one that is closed. A detour can therefore be chosen or imposed. The word does not establish that the destination has changed.

Dead end has both a road sense and a figurative sense involving the absence of further progress. Calling one route a dead end does not, by itself, describe every route in the surrounding landscape.

Constructed example	What is presented?	What remains open?
“I am at a crossroads, but the signs are missing.”	Alternatives without clear information about their destinations.	Whether information, permission or movement is the immediate difficulty.
“We took a detour to reach the same village.”	A changed route with a retained destination.	The reason for the change and its consequences.
“The street ends here, but a footpath continues.”	An ending that depends on the kind of route or traveller.	Who can use the continuation.
“We reached a dead end in the discussion.”	A judgement about the current course of a conversation.	Whether the participants regard it as final or specific to this approach.

Frost: choosing and later retelling

In Robert Frost's “The Road Not Taken”, the speaker considers two routes through a wood and cannot travel both at once. Although one initially seems less used, the poem subsequently describes their wear as similar. The speaker then imagines a future telling in which taking the less travelled route becomes decisive.

An editorial reading can compare the decision as described at the time with the anticipated story about it. The poem leaves room to examine uncertainty, selective recollection and the significance later attached to a choice. Treating its final lines alone as straightforward advice to choose the unusual route loses that tension.

An obstacle is not always a decision

Consider the difference between “I cannot choose a road” and “I have chosen, but the gate is locked.” In these original examples, the first concerns selecting a direction; the second concerns access after a selection. A description of hesitation should not silently replace a stated barrier, and a description of a barrier should not silently replace uncertainty about where to go.

The same care applies to returning. Going back may revisit a junction, abandon a destination or be part of a planned return journey. The sequence and purpose in the passage determine which description fits.

Questions for comparing a passage

• Are several routes available, merely visible, or only imagined?
• Does the destination remain the same when the route changes?
• Where does the route end, and for which traveller or means of travel?
• Is the account describing a choice as it happens or explaining it afterwards?

Related pages

• Paths and Trails
• Maps, Compasses and Lost Bearings
• Being Stuck: Barriers, Loops and Waiting
• Doors, Gates and Thresholds
• The Return Journey: Bringing Experience Back into Everyday Life
• Narrative and Interpretation

Comparative Metaphor Library | Subject index | Concepts and language