Difference between revisions of "The Cook's Tale"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Formatting cleanup: standardise headings and lists, remove em dashes, and tidy whitespace) |
(Add source notes and reading comparisons; preserve existing prose) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''The Cook's Tale''' is part of Geoffrey Chaucer's ''[[The Canterbury Tales]]''. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | == Summary == | |
| + | Perkyn Revelour is a London apprentice who prefers dancing, drinking and gambling to his work. His master dismisses him. Perkyn goes to live with a companion whose wife keeps a shop as a cover for prostitution. | ||
| − | + | The surviving tale breaks off at this point. It is more than an introduction to Perkyn, but it supplies no completed plot or moral resolution. Later scribes sometimes added material or placed ''Gamelyn'' after it; those additions should not be presented as Chaucer's surviving conclusion. | |
| − | :: | + | == Source == |
| + | [https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/cooks-tale Harvard's Geoffrey Chaucer Website: synopsis, context and link to the text.] | ||
| − | + | <!-- Article quality addition, October 2026 --> | |
| + | == Close reading and comparisons == | ||
| + | The opening portrait uses comparisons with a goldfinch, a berry and a hive of honey to present Perkyn's appearance and appetites. These are examples of figurative description within the tale, distinct from a reader's later interpretation of its unfinished plot. Read Chaucer's wording alongside the modern English gloss in [https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/cooks-prologue-and-tale Harvard's interlinear text], especially lines 4365–4378. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Metaphor, Metonymy, Simile, Analogy and Symbol]] helps distinguish an explicit comparison from a symbolic reading of an event. | ||
| + | * [[The Squire's Tale]] offers another surviving narrative that stops before its announced adventures are completed. Compare what each text actually supplies before imagining a conclusion. | ||
| + | * [[Narrative and Interpretation]] provides a route into the difference between the narrator's characterisation and a reader's judgement. | ||
| + | <!-- End article quality addition --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Related pages == | ||
| + | * [[The Canterbury Tales]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Browse the library == | ||
| + | [[:Category:Stories and literature|Stories and literature]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Subject index]] | [[Stories and literature]] | [[Special:AllPages|All articles A-Z]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Stories and literature]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:22, 7 October 2026
The Cook's Tale is part of Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales.
Summary
Perkyn Revelour is a London apprentice who prefers dancing, drinking and gambling to his work. His master dismisses him. Perkyn goes to live with a companion whose wife keeps a shop as a cover for prostitution.
The surviving tale breaks off at this point. It is more than an introduction to Perkyn, but it supplies no completed plot or moral resolution. Later scribes sometimes added material or placed Gamelyn after it; those additions should not be presented as Chaucer's surviving conclusion.
Source
Harvard's Geoffrey Chaucer Website: synopsis, context and link to the text.
Close reading and comparisons
The opening portrait uses comparisons with a goldfinch, a berry and a hive of honey to present Perkyn's appearance and appetites. These are examples of figurative description within the tale, distinct from a reader's later interpretation of its unfinished plot. Read Chaucer's wording alongside the modern English gloss in Harvard's interlinear text, especially lines 4365–4378.
- Metaphor, Metonymy, Simile, Analogy and Symbol helps distinguish an explicit comparison from a symbolic reading of an event.
- The Squire's Tale offers another surviving narrative that stops before its announced adventures are completed. Compare what each text actually supplies before imagining a conclusion.
- Narrative and Interpretation provides a route into the difference between the narrator's characterisation and a reader's judgement.