Difference between revisions of "Monsters"

From Metaphors of Movement Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Formatting cleanup: standardise headings and lists, remove em dashes, and tidy whitespace)
(Source mythic, literary, film and Behemoth examples; distinguish lexical uses from invented monstrous meanings)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
=Monsters=
+
'''Monsters''' are creatures represented as extraordinary, threatening or outside an expected order. The label depends on a story's viewpoint: a figure feared by one character may speak, suffer or seek recognition in another part of the narrative. This page brings together literary examples and expressions, rather than assigning one meaning to all monsters.
  
−
== Monsters in Literature and Film: A Cultural Legacy ==
+
== Monsters in Mythology and Folklore ==
−
Monsters have captivated the human imagination since time immemorial. From ancient mythologies to modern literature and film, these creatures have become an integral part of our cultural fabric, offering both entertainment and insight into our fears and aspirations. This article aims to explore the role of monsters in literature and film, as well as the evolution of these terrifying creatures and their influence on society.
+
Different narratives give extraordinary creatures different functions. In Apollodorus's account of the Hydra, cutting a mortal head produces two more, until Iolaus burns the cut places. The account distinguishes those heads from the immortal head that Heracles buries beneath a rock.<ref name="hydra">[https://www.theoi.com/Text/Apollodorus2.html Apollodorus, Library, translated by J. G. Frazer, 2.5.2]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
  
−
==== I. Monsters in Mythology and Folklore ====
+
In Snorri's account of Ragnarok, Thor kills the Midgard Serpent but dies after moving nine paces because of its venom. Victory over an opponent and survival are therefore different outcomes in this telling.<ref name="serpent">[https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/18947/pg18947-images.html Snorri Sturluson, The Younger Edda, translated by Rasmus B. Anderson, “The Fooling of Gylfe”, chapter XVI: Ragnarok]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
−
Long before the advent of the written word, oral traditions and folklore were used as vehicles to transmit tales of monsters and supernatural beings. These stories often served as cautionary tales, warnings against the dangers of the unknown, and a means to explain natural phenomena.
 
  
−
In Greek mythology, for instance, monsters such as the Hydra, Minotaur, and Medusa served as challenges for heroes to overcome. Similarly, in Norse mythology, the monstrous serpent Jörmungandr embodied the chaos and destruction that awaited the gods during the apocalypse. Other cultures, like the Celts and Slavs, also had their share of monstrous creatures that played crucial roles in their narratives.
+
For Medusa's severed head retaining its power, see [[Head and Neck#Greek Mythology: The Beheading of Medusa|the Ovid example]]. A creature's death does not always end its effects.
  
−
==== II. The Emergence of Monsters in Literature ====
+
== Monsters in Literature ==
−
As written language evolved, so too did the portrayal of monsters. In early literary works, monsters took on symbolic and allegorical roles, often representing the darker aspects of human nature. Classic examples include the "Inferno" section of Dante Alighieri's "Divine Comedy" (14th century), where monstrous beings such as Cerberus and Geryon serve as metaphors for the torments of Hell.
+
In Dante's ''Inferno'', Canto Six places Cerberus among the gluttonous; Canto Seventeen gives Geryon a human-looking face and a dangerous tail, identifies him with fraud, and makes him carry Dante and Virgil downward. Those are distinct narrative roles, not simply interchangeable images of the torments of Hell.<ref name="dante">[https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1001/1001-h/1001-h.htm Dante Alighieri, Inferno, translated by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Cantos VI and XVII]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
  
−
Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" (1818) marked a significant turning point in the literary depiction of monsters. In this groundbreaking novel, the eponymous monster is a product of human ambition and scientific hubris, challenging the boundaries of life and morality. With this, the Gothic tradition of literature emerged, giving rise to other famous monsters such as Bram Stoker's Dracula and Robert Louis Stevenson's Mr. Hyde.
+
In Mary Shelley's ''Frankenstein'', Victor Frankenstein is the creator; the creature is not given his creator's surname as a personal name in the novel. The creature's own narrative complicates a view of him solely as an external threat.<ref name="shelley">[https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/84 Mary Shelley, Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, Project Gutenberg edition]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
  
−
==== III. Monsters in Film ====
+
The novel belongs to a Gothic tradition that already included works such as Horace Walpole's ''The Castle of Otranto''. It did not initiate the whole tradition.<ref name="walpole">[https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/696 Horace Walpole, The Castle of Otranto, Project Gutenberg edition]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
−
The advent of cinema in the late 19th century opened up new avenues for exploring the monstrous. Early silent films such as "Nosferatu" (1922) introduced the power of visual storytelling, amplifying the impact of monsters on audiences.
 
  
−
With the advent of sound and special effects, films like "King Kong" (1933) and "Godzilla" (1954) brought gargantuan monsters to life, while the Universal Studios' classic monster series (including "Dracula", "Frankenstein", and "The Wolf Man") solidified the place of these creatures in popular culture. As the horror genre developed, monsters became more diverse, incorporating elements of science fiction and psychological horror. Iconic characters like Ridley Scott's Xenomorph from "Alien" (1979) and Wes Craven's Freddy Krueger from "A Nightmare on Elm Street" (1984) pushed the boundaries of what a monster could be.
+
== Monsters in Film ==
 +
Film comparisons need to identify the production. F. W. Murnau's ''Nosferatu'' (1922) adapts the vampire material of ''Dracula''; Christian Nyby's ''The Thing from Another World'' (1951) places an alien threat at an Arctic research station; Ishiro Honda's ''Godzilla'' (1954) presents a giant creature and urban destruction. The BFI's film survey identifies these works and their contexts.<ref name="monster-films">[https://www.bfi.org.uk/lists/great-horror-film-from-every-year-from-1922-now BFI, A great horror film for every year, entries for 1922, 1951 and 1954]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
  
−
==== IV. The Modern Monster: Reflections of Society ====
+
Scale, location and access offer concrete comparisons: a creature entering a home, threatening an isolated station or overwhelming a city produces different relationships between threat and shelter. These are editorial comparison questions, not claims that all audiences respond in the same way.
−
Contemporary literature and film have continued to explore the concept of the monster, often reflecting the anxieties and concerns of society. Post-apocalyptic narratives such as Cormac McCarthy's "The Road" (2006) and the "Resident Evil" film series (2002-2016) present monstrous beings as the result of a world gone awry, often due to human action or negligence. Similarly, works like Stephen King's "It" (1986) explore the monstrous as manifestations of deep-seated, collective fears.
 
  
−
In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards humanising monsters, as seen in the popular television series "Hannibal" (2013-2015) and Guillermo del Toro's "The Shape of Water" (2017). These works challenge the notion of the monster as a purely malevolent being, offering more nuanced portrayals that encourage empathy and understanding.
+
== Viewpoint and interpretation ==
 +
The creature's own account in ''Frankenstein'' is already a reason to examine viewpoint, rather than describing sympathetic monsters as only a recent development. Ask whether a work gives the creature speech, memories, relationships or a chance to explain its conduct. A sympathetic viewpoint can coexist with harmful acts; it need not erase them.<ref name="shelley" />
  
−
==== V. Conclusion: The Enduring Appeal of Monsters ====
+
== Questions for comparison ==
−
The enduring appeal of monsters in literature and film lies in their ability to evoke our most primal fears and desires, serving as both cautionary tales and opportunities for catharsis. As society evolves, so too do our monsters, continually adapting to reflect our ever-changing world. From ancient mythologies to the latest blockbuster, monsters have and will continue to hold a unique place in our cultural landscape, capturing the imaginations of generations to come.
+
Who calls the figure a monster? What does it do, and what do others do to it? Is its size, appearance, conduct or origin the source of fear? Compare an external opponent with a creature allowed to narrate its own experience.
  
 
== The Biblical Behemoth ==
 
== The Biblical Behemoth ==
−
The Behemoth, a colossal creature mentioned in the Hebrew Bible, serves as a potent symbol of unrivalled strength and power. This enigmatic beast makes its sole appearance in the Book of Job, which is a poetic and philosophical work of the Old Testament. As a complex and richly-layered text, the Book of Job grapples with the problem of human suffering and the nature of divine justice.
+
Job 40:15–24 describes Behemoth eating grass, possessing great bodily strength and resting among vegetation near water. The speaker directs Job's attention to a creature that human capture cannot easily master. The passage does not identify a modern zoological species.<ref name="behemoth-job">[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job%2040%3A15-24&version=KJV Job 40:15–24, King James Version]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
  
−
The Behemoth is introduced in Job 40:15-24, where it is depicted as an awe-inspiring beast with a robust physique, indomitable spirit, and unmatched authority among other creatures. This description is intended to emphasise the unfathomable power of God, who is portrayed as the only being capable of creating, taming, and controlling such a formidable creature.
+
The English noun ''behemoth'' can describe something exceptionally large or powerful.<ref name="behemoth-word">[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/behemoth Merriam-Webster, “behemoth”]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref> That dictionary sense should be distinguished from claims about the identity of the biblical creature or its role in a particular later religious tradition. Such claims need their own sources.
−
 
 
−
The etymology of the term 'Behemoth' can be traced to the Hebrew word 'בהמות' (bəhēmōth), which is the plural form of 'בהמה' (bəhēmāh), meaning 'beast' or 'large animal'. The use of the plural form in this context may signify the sheer enormity and incomparability of the creature. Despite its roots in Hebrew, the term 'Behemoth' has been adopted into the English language and is commonly used to describe anything of immense size or power.
 
−
 
 
−
The precise nature of the Behemoth has been the subject of much scholarly debate, with various interpretations suggesting that it could be an allegory, an ancient myth, or a real-life creature. Some scholars propose that the Behemoth may have been inspired by an actual animal, such as a hippopotamus, an elephant, or a now-extinct dinosaur. This hypothesis is supported by the descriptions provided in the biblical text, which detail the creature's herbivorous diet, sizeable proportions, and aquatic habitat. Others contend that the Behemoth is a purely symbolic figure, representing chaos and the forces of nature that humans cannot comprehend or control.
 
−
 
 
−
It is important to note that the Behemoth is often associated with another biblical creature, the Leviathan. These two beasts are frequently mentioned together in Jewish and Christian apocalyptic literature, embodying the ultimate manifestations of chaos and disorder that will be vanquished at the end of time. In this context, the Behemoth and Leviathan serve as potent metaphors for the cosmic battle between good and evil, underscoring the omnipotence of God and His ultimate triumph over the forces of chaos.
 
  
 
== Monstrous Idioms ==
 
== Monstrous Idioms ==
−
These expressions are deeply ingrained in the English (UK) language, and they often convey deeper meanings or emotions through vivid and evocative imagery. Here is a curated list of such idioms:
+
The following are established lexical uses or expressions. They do not all imply a literal creature:
−
 
+
* '''A monster / monstrous:''' these words can describe great size or something considered cruel or shocking. ''A monstrous appetite'' is an ordinary use of the adjective, not necessarily a separate idiom.<ref name="monstrous">[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monstrous Merriam-Webster, “monstrous”]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
−
::'''A monster of one's own making''': This idiom refers to a situation or problem that someone has created for themselves, and now they must deal with the consequences. The imagery of a monster represents the severity and magnitude of the issue.
+
* '''A Jekyll and Hyde:''' a person displaying sharply contrasting aspects, one regarded as good and the other as evil. The expression is a literary comparison, not a clinical diagnosis.<ref name="jekyll">[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Jekyll%20and%20Hyde Merriam-Webster, “Jekyll and Hyde”]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
−
 
+
* '''Throw someone to the wolves:''' leave someone exposed to a bad situation without help, often to protect oneself.<ref name="wolves">[https://www.dictionary.com/browse/wolf Dictionary.com, “wolf”, idiomatic uses]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
−
::'''To have a monstrous appetite''': This expression describes someone who is extremely hungry or has an insatiable desire for something, often metaphorically. The use of the term 'monstrous' emphasises the intensity of their craving.
+
* '''A Trojan horse:''' something apparently acceptable that conceals a means of harm or subversion.<ref name="trojan">[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Trojan%20horse Merriam-Webster, “Trojan horse”]. Accessed 9 October 2026.</ref>
−
 
 
−
::'''Monstrous regiment''': This phrase has a historical context, as it was originally used to describe a group of powerful and influential women. However, in contemporary usage, it can refer to any group or organisation that is perceived to be unruly or disorderly. The idiom likens such a group to a monstrous entity, capable of wreaking havoc.
 
−
 
 
−
::'''A whale of a time''': This idiom describes an exceptionally enjoyable and entertaining experience. While not precisely a monster, the whale is a colossal and awe-inspiring creature, making it an appropriate metaphor for an extraordinary event.
 
−
 
 
−
::'''The elephant in the room''': This expression refers to a significant or obvious issue that people avoid discussing or acknowledging. The metaphorical elephant represents the monstrous size and presence of the issue, making it difficult to ignore.
 
−
 
 
−
::'''Let sleeping dogs lie''': This idiom advises against revisiting a past conflict or issue, as doing so may provoke unnecessary trouble or complications. The sleeping dog serves as a metaphor for a dormant, potentially dangerous situation that could turn monstrous if disturbed.
 
−
 
 
−
::'''To unleash the kraken''': Derived from the mythological sea monster, the Kraken, this expression signifies unleashing a powerful and uncontrollable force, often with unpredictable consequences. The kraken represents the destructive potential of the unleashed entity.
 
  
−
::'''A gargoyle's grin''': This idiom is used to describe a sinister or malicious smile, one that may be perceived as untrustworthy or menacing. Gargoyles, often found on Gothic buildings, are grotesque stone creatures, and their eerie expressions serve as a fitting metaphor for a disquieting grin.
+
''A monster of one's own making'' is a productive comparison: the surrounding account needs to establish who created what and why it is called monstrous. A dramatic phrase such as ''release the kraken'' likewise needs its particular quotation or scene identified.
  
−
::'''A Herculean task''': This expression refers to an incredibly difficult or arduous undertaking, often requiring extraordinary effort or strength. The idiom is derived from the ancient Greek myth of Hercules, who had to complete twelve seemingly impossible labours. Though Hercules is not a monster, his encounters with various monstrous creatures during his trials make this idiom relevant.
+
Other animal or mythological expressions, including ''a whale of a time'', ''the elephant in the room'', ''let sleeping dogs lie'', ''a Herculean task'' and ''a Sisyphean task'', should not be given an invented monstrous meaning just to fit this page. Compare the wording in context and follow the relevant story or subject page.
  
−
::'''To have a Jekyll and Hyde personality''': This idiom is used to describe someone with a dual nature, exhibiting both good and bad qualities or behaviours. The expression is derived from the famous novel "The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde" by Robert Louis Stevenson, in which the protagonist transforms into a monstrous alter ego. The idiom captures the unpredictability and danger of this duality.
+
== Related pages ==
 +
* [[Frankenstein]] : creator, creature and competing viewpoints
 +
* [[St George and The Dragon]] : a particular dragon legend
 +
* [[The Company of Wolves]]
 +
* [[Apocalypse]]
 +
* [[Angels]]
 +
* [[Demons]]
 +
* [[The Golem]]
  
−
::'''To open Pandora's box''': This expression signifies the act of initiating a chain of events that leads to numerous unforeseen and often negative consequences. It originates from Greek mythology, where Pandora, the first woman on Earth, unwittingly unleashed all the world's evils by opening a forbidden box. The monstrous repercussions of her actions make this idiom fitting for our analysis.
+
== Sources ==
 +
<references />
  
−
::'''A Sisyphean task''': This idiom refers to a seemingly endless or futile task, one that requires continuous effort without any hope of success. The expression is derived from the Greek myth of Sisyphus, who was condemned to eternally roll a boulder uphill, only for it to roll back down each time he neared the summit. While Sisyphus himself is not a monster, the monstrous nature of his punishment lends this idiom relevance.
+
== Browse the library ==
 +
[[:Category:Beings, creatures and nature|Beings, creatures and nature]]
  
−
::'''To throw someone to the wolves''': This expression means to abandon someone to a dangerous or difficult situation without any assistance or protection. The idiom evokes the image of a vulnerable individual left at the mercy of ravenous, monstrous wolves, highlighting the ruthlessness and potential peril involved.
+
[[Subject index]] | [[Stories and literature]] | [[Special:AllPages|All articles A-Z]]
  
−
::'''A Trojan horse''': This idiom denotes a seemingly innocuous or helpful entity that conceals a hidden danger or threat. It originates from the ancient Greek story of the Trojan horse, a massive wooden structure that allowed Greek soldiers to infiltrate the city of Troy undetected. The horse represents a monstrous deception, with the potential to bring about devastating consequences.
+
[[Category:Beings, creatures and nature]]

Latest revision as of 17:43, 9 October 2026

Monsters are creatures represented as extraordinary, threatening or outside an expected order. The label depends on a story's viewpoint: a figure feared by one character may speak, suffer or seek recognition in another part of the narrative. This page brings together literary examples and expressions, rather than assigning one meaning to all monsters.

Monsters in Mythology and Folklore

Different narratives give extraordinary creatures different functions. In Apollodorus's account of the Hydra, cutting a mortal head produces two more, until Iolaus burns the cut places. The account distinguishes those heads from the immortal head that Heracles buries beneath a rock.[1]

In Snorri's account of Ragnarok, Thor kills the Midgard Serpent but dies after moving nine paces because of its venom. Victory over an opponent and survival are therefore different outcomes in this telling.[2]

For Medusa's severed head retaining its power, see the Ovid example. A creature's death does not always end its effects.

Monsters in Literature

In Dante's Inferno, Canto Six places Cerberus among the gluttonous; Canto Seventeen gives Geryon a human-looking face and a dangerous tail, identifies him with fraud, and makes him carry Dante and Virgil downward. Those are distinct narrative roles, not simply interchangeable images of the torments of Hell.[3]

In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein is the creator; the creature is not given his creator's surname as a personal name in the novel. The creature's own narrative complicates a view of him solely as an external threat.[4]

The novel belongs to a Gothic tradition that already included works such as Horace Walpole's The Castle of Otranto. It did not initiate the whole tradition.[5]

Monsters in Film

Film comparisons need to identify the production. F. W. Murnau's Nosferatu (1922) adapts the vampire material of Dracula; Christian Nyby's The Thing from Another World (1951) places an alien threat at an Arctic research station; Ishiro Honda's Godzilla (1954) presents a giant creature and urban destruction. The BFI's film survey identifies these works and their contexts.[6]

Scale, location and access offer concrete comparisons: a creature entering a home, threatening an isolated station or overwhelming a city produces different relationships between threat and shelter. These are editorial comparison questions, not claims that all audiences respond in the same way.

Viewpoint and interpretation

The creature's own account in Frankenstein is already a reason to examine viewpoint, rather than describing sympathetic monsters as only a recent development. Ask whether a work gives the creature speech, memories, relationships or a chance to explain its conduct. A sympathetic viewpoint can coexist with harmful acts; it need not erase them.[4]

Questions for comparison

Who calls the figure a monster? What does it do, and what do others do to it? Is its size, appearance, conduct or origin the source of fear? Compare an external opponent with a creature allowed to narrate its own experience.

The Biblical Behemoth

Job 40:15–24 describes Behemoth eating grass, possessing great bodily strength and resting among vegetation near water. The speaker directs Job's attention to a creature that human capture cannot easily master. The passage does not identify a modern zoological species.[7]

The English noun behemoth can describe something exceptionally large or powerful.[8] That dictionary sense should be distinguished from claims about the identity of the biblical creature or its role in a particular later religious tradition. Such claims need their own sources.

Monstrous Idioms

The following are established lexical uses or expressions. They do not all imply a literal creature:

  • A monster / monstrous: these words can describe great size or something considered cruel or shocking. A monstrous appetite is an ordinary use of the adjective, not necessarily a separate idiom.[9]
  • A Jekyll and Hyde: a person displaying sharply contrasting aspects, one regarded as good and the other as evil. The expression is a literary comparison, not a clinical diagnosis.[10]
  • Throw someone to the wolves: leave someone exposed to a bad situation without help, often to protect oneself.[11]
  • A Trojan horse: something apparently acceptable that conceals a means of harm or subversion.[12]

A monster of one's own making is a productive comparison: the surrounding account needs to establish who created what and why it is called monstrous. A dramatic phrase such as release the kraken likewise needs its particular quotation or scene identified.

Other animal or mythological expressions, including a whale of a time, the elephant in the room, let sleeping dogs lie, a Herculean task and a Sisyphean task, should not be given an invented monstrous meaning just to fit this page. Compare the wording in context and follow the relevant story or subject page.

Related pages

Sources

  1. ↑ Apollodorus, Library, translated by J. G. Frazer, 2.5.2. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  2. ↑ Snorri Sturluson, The Younger Edda, translated by Rasmus B. Anderson, “The Fooling of Gylfe”, chapter XVI: Ragnarok. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  3. ↑ Dante Alighieri, Inferno, translated by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Cantos VI and XVII. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Mary Shelley, Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, Project Gutenberg edition. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  5. ↑ Horace Walpole, The Castle of Otranto, Project Gutenberg edition. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  6. ↑ BFI, A great horror film for every year, entries for 1922, 1951 and 1954. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  7. ↑ Job 40:15–24, King James Version. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  8. ↑ Merriam-Webster, “behemoth”. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  9. ↑ Merriam-Webster, “monstrous”. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  10. ↑ Merriam-Webster, “Jekyll and Hyde”. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  11. ↑ Dictionary.com, “wolf”, idiomatic uses. Accessed 9 October 2026.
  12. ↑ Merriam-Webster, “Trojan horse”. Accessed 9 October 2026.

Browse the library

Beings, creatures and nature

Subject index | Stories and literature | All articles A-Z

Retrieved from ‘https://metaphorsofmovement.wiki/index.php?title=Monsters&oldid=2254’